Re-understanding the Value of the Phone Number List Internet

Real time phone number list discussion.
Post Reply
monira123
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 17, 2022 6:07 am

Re-understanding the Value of the Phone Number List Internet

Post by monira123 »

That's when Coase stepped up and, after several debates, published the far-reaching Problem of Social Cost. He believes that all injuries are mutual. In these cases, there is no one who hurts the other. It should be seen from a different perspective that the two sides are competing for some scarce resources. Railway companies and farmers are fighting for the right to use the land next to the railway, and chicken farms and residents are fighting for the right to use fresh air, for which he won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1991. 1) The case of trains and flax In fact, the phone number list above two cases are real events. How did the judge think about this issue in the end? Law and Economics: Epstein proposed a way of thinking, what would happen if the railroad company and the farm owner were the same person, then he would surely move the phone number list flax farther from the railroad without thinking How to keep trains from spewing out Mars.

What would happen if a judge ruled that the railroad company was responsible for burning the flax? In order to prevent such a thing from happening again, the railway company needs to buy the phone number list land next to the railway, which is obviously very costly, and the land resources next to the railway are also wasted. In the end, the Phone Number List judge ruled that the farmer should bear more responsibility. This is a very important idea, and it is based on this idea that Coase proposed that whoever avoids accidents with lower costs should take more responsibility, so as to make society as a whole more efficient. 2) Cases of chicken farms and residents We also went to see how the phone number list judge decided this case. The residents thought that the chicken farm had hurt them, but the judge said, "They didn't hurt you.

They set up the factory far away, because you were close to them." But the phone number list judge also said that urban development is inevitable and should be encouraged. We should not limit the development of the whole city because of a chicken farm, so the residents can ask the chicken farm to move out, but the residents deprive the chicken farm of the rights that the chicken farm should have, so they should bear the cost of the chicken farm relocation. Is such a judgment more conducive to social development than a judgment in favor of one party? What if the phone number list judge ruled in favor of the chicken farm? Then a lot of factories will be set up in the suburbs of a city early, and the development of the city will be restricted in the end, which is obviously not good for the whole society.
Post Reply